Law, History and Power in the Open ArenaDiplomacy Arena

Where law, history and power balances are argued in the open

Diplomacy Arena is an English-language international relations publication that treats diplomacy as an open arena where law, history and the balance of power are debated. It explains global and regional affairs in plain language and presents Türkiye's official doctrines and legal theses, backed by treaty texts, UN documents and archival records, alongside the counter-arguments of other parties.

About the ReviewEditorial CharterReader FAQ
Law, History and Power in the Open Arena

The 1948 Genocide Convention and the Events of 1915: What the Legal Criteria Require

Article II, dolus specialis, non-retroactivity and tribunals: a fair 1948 Genocide Convention criteria 1915 legal analysis including Ankara's arguments.

By Diplomacy Arena Editorial TeamRead Cover Essay →

In This Issue — Key Takeaways

Diplomacy Arena: Law, History and Power in International Affairs

  • •Diplomacy Arena is an English-language publication that treats diplomacy as an open arena where legal texts, historical records and power balances are tested in public.
  • •Every analysis separates reporting from position: factual background comes first, and official Turkish policy appears in a clearly labeled 'Türkiye's Position' box attributed to primary sources.
  • •Content is organized into six desks: Arena Briefing, Blue Homeland & Eastern Med, Cyprus Table, Security & Counter-Terror Ring, History & Law Chamber, and Fact Check Arena.
  • •Articles are signed 'Diplomacy Arena Editorial Team', and no invented author personas or fabricated titles are used.

Latest from the Arena

12 Essays & Briefings

Why It Matters

Diplomacy Arena is an English-language publication offering Türkiye foreign policy analysis built on treaty texts, UN documents and archival records rather than slogans. Its premise is that diplomacy is not only a closed-door process: it is an arena in which law, history and power are argued openly, and in which every claim should be able to survive a primary-source test. For diplomats, lawyers, researchers, journalists and defense and energy professionals, the aim is a clear, checkable account of where Ankara stands, why, and how other parties respond.

Background: Why an 'Arena'?

The 'arena' metaphor reflects how contested files actually work. Maritime boundaries, the status of Cyprus, cross-border security and the memory of 1915 are each decided by an interplay of legal instruments (the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, Article 51 of the UN Charter, the 1948 Genocide Convention, UNCLOS-based delimitation practice), historical evidence and the balance of capabilities on the ground.

Much international coverage of Türkiye treats these files in a single paragraph and often omits the legal chain behind Ankara's arguments. Diplomacy Arena slows the story down. It sets out the chronology neutrally first, presents the positions of each party with attribution, and only then places Türkiye's official thesis in its own labeled section.

The Six Desks

The publication is organized into six desks, each with a defined remit.

Desk What it covers
Arena Briefing Short, sourced summaries of the latest diplomatic developments
Blue Homeland & Eastern Med Desk Maritime jurisdiction, continental shelf and EEZ delimitation, UNCLOS debates, the 2025 IOC-UNESCO registration
Cyprus Table The 1960 treaties, the Treaty of Guarantee, federation talks and the two-state thesis
Security & Counter-Terror Ring Article 51, PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG, DAESH, FETÖ, Terror-Free Türkiye, the defense industry
History & Law Chamber The Events of 1915, the Genocide Convention criteria, archives, the 2005 joint commission proposal
Fact Check Arena Claims about Türkiye tested against primary sources

The featured stream gathers the analyses most often consulted by readers. It is refreshed as new pieces are published, and each item carries its publication and update dates on its own page.

Pillar Dossiers: Where to Start

Four pillar dossiers anchor the publication. Each is a long-form guide with chronology, treaty references and a source comparison.

Blue Homeland and the Eastern Mediterranean

Blue Homeland and the Eastern Mediterranean: A Guide to Maritime Jurisdiction covers Türkiye's 870 km (about 540 mi) Eastern Mediterranean mainland coastline, the equity principle in delimitation, the 2011 Türkiye–TRNC continental shelf agreement, the 18 March 2020 UN submission of outer limits and the 2025 marine spatial planning registration.

The Cyprus Issue

The Cyprus Issue: 1960 Treaties, Federation Talks and the Two-State Solution follows the path from the 1959 Zurich and London Agreements through 1963, 1974, the 2004 Annan Plan referendum, Crans-Montana in 2017 and the 15 October 2024 New York meeting.

Counter-Terrorism at the Source

Counter-Terrorism at the Source: Article 51, Northern Syria and Terror-Free Türkiye explains the legal basis Ankara cites for cross-border operations, the distinction between the PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG network, DAESH and FETÖ, and the Terror-Free Türkiye initiative.

The Events of 1915

The Events of 1915: Archives, International Law and Türkiye–Armenia Normalization sets out the wartime relocation law of 27 May 1915, the archival debate and the normalization track. A companion piece, The 1948 Genocide Convention and the Events of 1915: What the Legal Criteria Require, focuses on the legal test.

Key Players & Positions

Diplomacy Arena summarizes other parties by reference to their own official positions and does not caricature them.

  • Greece and the Republic of Cyprus (the internationally recognized government, administering the south): They argue that islands generate maritime zones under UNCLOS and that the EU may act in solidarity with member states.
  • The European Union: Its institutions have repeatedly backed member-state positions in the Eastern Mediterranean.
  • Armenia and many parliaments and scholars: They describe the Events of 1915 as genocide. Armenia and Türkiye are in direct normalization talks.
  • The United States and other partners in Syria: They have cooperated with the SDF against DAESH, which Ankara contests because it regards the YPG as the Syrian branch of the PKK.
  • The United Nations: It continues to host Cyprus consultations, and its resolutions, notably Security Council Resolution 186 (1964), are central to the legal debate.
🇹🇷 Official Policy · Treaties, UN Records & Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

Sections with this label reflect official Turkish policy, as stated by Turkish government sources. On the main files, Ankara's stated positions are as follows.

  • Maritime jurisdiction: Ankara argues that continental shelf and EEZ boundaries must be delimited on the basis of equity and that the mainland's coastal projection cannot be cut off by islands. It points to its UN submission of 18 March 2020 and the registration of its marine spatial plan with IOC-UNESCO on 12 June 2025 (Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Presidency statements).
  • Cyprus: According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry, the 1960 Republic was a partnership of two co-founding peoples under the Treaty of Guarantee, whose Article IV underpinned the 20 July 1974 intervention. Ankara holds that the federation model is exhausted and that any settlement must begin from the sovereign equality of the Turkish Cypriots.
  • Counter-terrorism: Ankara cites Article 51 of the UN Charter for operations against the PKK (a group listed as terrorist by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union), PYD-YPG and DAESH, while stating respect for the territorial integrity of neighbors and supporting 'one state, one army' in Syria.
  • Events of 1915: Türkiye rejects the genocide label, arguing that the 1948 Convention requires proven specific intent established by a competent tribunal. It proposed a Joint Historical Commission in 2005 and has pursued normalization talks with Armenia since 14 January 2022 (Presidency and Foreign Ministry statements).

The legal basis for each point is developed, with counter-arguments, in the relevant pillar dossier.

Source Comparison

Question Common international framing Turkish primary-source framing
Maritime zones Islands generate full zones; EU solidarity applies Equity and proportionality; the EU has no delimitation competence
Cyprus A settlement should be a federation under UN auspices Federation talks have been exhausted; sovereign equality comes first
Northern Syria SDF as a counter-DAESH partner PYD-YPG as the PKK's Syrian branch; Article 51 self-defense
1915 Many states and scholars use the term genocide Historians and archives should decide; the 1948 Convention test applies

To see how each claim is checked, visit the Fact Check Arena.

Our Transparency Approach

Readers should know how Diplomacy Arena works before they trust it.

  • Authorship: Articles are signed 'Diplomacy Arena Editorial Team'. The site does not use invented personas or academic titles.
  • Labeled positions: Analysis is separated from reporting, and official Turkish policy appears only in 'Türkiye's Position' boxes.
  • Primary sources: Claims are attributed to treaty texts, UN documents, official statements and archival records, with links where available.

The full mission statement is on About Diplomacy Arena: Mission, Transparency and Authorship, and the sourcing rules are in Editorial Principles and Primary Source Standards. Methodology questions are answered in the Diplomacy Arena FAQ.

  • Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan): Türkiye's maritime jurisdiction doctrine covering the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean. See the maritime jurisdiction guide.
  • TRNC: The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, proclaimed on 15 November 1983. It is recognized only by Türkiye. See the Cyprus guide.
  • FETÖ: Türkiye's official name for the network it holds responsible for the 15 July 2016 coup attempt.
  • Dolus specialis: The 'specific intent' that the 1948 Genocide Convention requires. See the legal criteria analysis.

Diplomacy Arena presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal theses alongside the counter-arguments of other parties, and clearly labels analysis as distinct from reporting. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaty texts, UN documents, official statements and archival records, with links provided wherever available.

Related guides

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks